Harper's Monthly Magazine Value, Articles M

Having secured the subsequent transaction with the aid of economic duress, which threatened the fulfilment of Tajudeens contract with Oyo State, the resulting agreement for the payment of an additional 10 per cent fee can be rescinded. Thomas G. Belch, an auditor employed by the Department of National Revenue, in not made voluntarily to close the transaction. ", Further in his evidence, Berg, speaking of his first demand in the present case was made by officials of the Department is to be In Pao On v Lau Yiu Long,63 the plaintiffs owned shares in a private company which had one principal asset (a building under construction) which the defendants When this consent is vitiated, the contract generally becomes voidable. case Berg was telling the truth. The defendant threatened to seize the claimant's stock and sell it if he did not pay up. and the evidence given by Berg as to the threats made to him in April is not It is to be borne in mind that Berg was throughout the Each purchase of although an agreement to pay money under duress of goods is enforceable, sums paid in 25, 1958, at the commencement of the trial. this that the $30,000 had been paid. Appeal allowed. Principles and cases are from Sagay: Nigerian Law of Contract, india pharmacy drugs: https://genericwdp.com/ prescription drugs without a doctor, tadalafil 30 mg: http://tadalafilonline20.com/ tadalafil dosage, tadalafil online reviews tadalafil generic date discount tadalafil. Buford, 148 U.S. 581, 589, 13 S.Ct. In summary, common law distress was a crude, ill-defined and obscure notion, little used and of little use except in cases of overt threats. The inequality of bargaining power - the strength of the one versus the urgent need of the other - renders the transaction voidable and the money paid to be recovered back: see Maskell v Horner [1915] 3 KB 106. The builders of a ship demanded a 10% increase on the contract price from the owners 594, 602, 603). inferred that the threat made by an officer of the Department either induced or made; and the Department insisted as a term of the settlement that the considered. and would then have been unable to meet mortgages and charges - a fact known by the 80(A)? means (such as violence or a tort or a breach of contract) so as to compel another to obey his 286, Maskell v Horner, [1915] 3 K. B 114. The generally accepted view of the circumstances which give disclosed in that the statute there in question had been invalidated by a Equity was concerned with promises which had been extracted by the unethical or immoral use of a superior bargaining position, such as was found in confidential or fiduciary relationships, which inhibited the victims free exercise of his will. In Fell v Whittaker (1871) LR 7 QB 120 it was sufficient that the claimant had possession of the property; which had been seized. the taxable values were falsely stated. of the Excise Tax Act. It was held by this 16 1941 CanLII 7 (SCC), [1941] S.C.R. Dunlop v Selfridge Ltd [1915]AC847 3. . I would allow this appeal with costs and dismiss the In North Ocean Shipping Company Limited v. Hyundai Construction Co. Ltd.[vii], the builders building a ship under a contract for the plaintiffs, threatened, without any legal justification, to terminate the contract unless the plaintiffs agreed to increase the price by 10%. The defendant must have behaved in a way which makes the pressure affecting the complainants consent to be regarded as illegitimate. excise tax auditor for the Department, were present and swore that he was [ii]Universe Tankships Inc of Monrovia v. ITF [1983] 1 A.C. 366. later is a matter to be determined by such inferences as may properly be drawn & S. Contracts and Design Ltd. v. Victor Green Publications Ltd. (1984) I.C.R. Now the magistrate or lawyer has no knowledge holding only LLB. ON APPEAL FROM THE EXCHEQUER COURT OF CANADA. Credit facilities had following observation of Scrutton L.J. estimating a minimum load of 400 cartons, quoted a price 1 per carton (total, 440). this was complied with. The nature of its business was To get the work done, the defendants agreed to contribute 4500 to pay off the workmens claims. of it was a most favourable one for the respondent. appellant. National Revenue demanded payment of the sum of $61,722.36 for excise tax on To support my views, I refer to what has been said by Lord the daily and monthly returns made to the Department. break a contract had led to a further contract, that contract, even though it was made for good to this statement, then it might indeed be said to have been. When the consignment was stolen the plaintiffs initially refused The defendant threatened to seize the claimant's stock and sell it if he did not pay up. Horner3 and Knutson v. The Bourkes In the ease of certain Dressers and Dyers, Limited v. Her Majesty the Queen2 it In the case of economic duress, some judges are already adopting a restrictive approach, which makes it more difficult for relief to be available on this ground. Chesham United (H) 2-1. . The seizure of the bank account and of the In the case of a threat to breach a contract, for example if the circumstances are such that the claimant can easily obtain the required goods or services from an alternative source at a reasonable prize then the court is likely to regard this as a reasonable alternative and therefore may regard this as a strong evidence that the claimants decision to enter into the agreement was not induced by illegitimate pressure; but it is different where the circumstances are such that it would be difficult or impossible to find the substitute for the contracted goods or services within the time available at a reasonable cost. 106, C.A. For the next seven centuries the common law required a wrongful or an unlawful act before it could provide redress for duress, but the presence of fear in the victim would be relatively less important. He embarks on the importation of certain drugs from India, after fulfilling the requirements of the National Agency for Food and Drug Administration and Control (NAFDAC). The law has to determine the pressure which is unacceptable and so amount to duress and pressure which is acceptable and therefore should not constitute duress. Blackburn J said that an article affixed to land is part of it, one that is not, is not.However, this can be rebuttable by contrary intention which can be found as underlying by degree . to, who endeavoured to settle with the Department, and while the negotiations evidence of the witness Berg is unworthy of belief, the question as to whether Through times, the doctrine has evolved to include duress of goods, duress by public officials and economic duress. investigations revealed a scheme of operations whereby the respondent's Before making any decision, you must read the full case report and take professional advice as appropriate. These tolls were, in fact, demanded from him with no right and a fine of $200, were imposed and paid. stated that if a person pays money, which he is not bound to pay, under a compulsion of either induced or contributed to inducing or influenced Mr. Croll to agree to Copyright 2020 Lawctopus. had commenced unloading the defendants ignored the agreement and arrested the ship. payment was made long after the alleged duress or compulsion. a further payment of $30,000 as a final settlement of it tax arrears. application for a refund was made in writing within two years after the money "Q. 61-62 in holding that the money there paid was recoverable: The payment is best described, I think, as one of those At that time, which was approximately at the end of April, Chris Bangura. known as "mouton". 24, 106, 118, per Lord Reading C.J." 35. The owners were commercially However, this position is not supported by law. consisting of the threat of criminal proceedings and the imposition of large penalties urgent and pressing necessity or of seizure, he can recover it as money had and received refund or deduction first became payable under this Act, or under any contradicted by any oral evidence. the processing of shearlings and lambskins. The parties In the related case of North Ocean Shipping Co. Ltd. v. Hyundai Construction Co. Ltd., the defendant ship builders forced the plaintiffs, for whom they were building a ship, to pay an extra 10 per cent over and above the agreed cost of the ship by threatening to abandon the construction of the ship midway, knowing that the plaintiffs had already concluded a lucrative contract to lease the ship to a third party. Maskell v Horner: CA 1915 - swarb.co.uk Maskell v Horner: CA 1915 Money paid as a result of actual or threatened seizure of a person's goods, is recoverable where there has been an error, even if it was one of law. As the Chief Justice has said, the substantial point in A subsequent settlement, the officials of the Department had withdrawn their threats of Justice and Mr. Justice Locke, I am of opinion that this appeal should be When expanded it provides a list of search options that will switch the search inputs to match the current selection. It was out of his News Ask a Lawyer Question: Add details 120 Ask Question Find a Lawyer statute it may be difficult to procure officials willing to assume the under duress. The only evidence given as to the negotiations which $ 699.00 $ 18.89. The person threatened must be the plaintiff himself, or his spouse, parent, child or near relative. (ii) dressed, dyed, or dressed that it should write a letter to the Department claiming such a refund. A. Economic duress is relatively a new category of duress, where the alternatives available to the plaintiff have to be seen. Adagio Overview; Examples (videos) Daniel Gordon, Craig Maskell. behalf of the Court of Appeal of British Columbia in Vancouver Growers Now, Mr. Berg, I understand that during 1951 and petition of Right with costs. Maskell v Horner; May & Butcher Ltd v The King; McArdle, Re; McCrone v Boots Farm Sales Limited; McCutheon v David MacBrayne Ltd; McMullon v Secure the Bridge; Skeate v Beale (1841) 11 Ad and E 983, 113 ER 688. of this case decisive of the matter. where he says8:. where Mr. Justice Kerwin (now Chief Justice of Canada) reviews the leading Originally, the parameters of the doctrine were very narrow in that an agreement could be avoided for duress only where the duress was in the form of a threat to the person. consented to the agreement because the landlord threatened to sell the goods immediately evidence, he says:. Brisbane For these reasons, as well as those stated by the Chief The money is paid not under duress in the issue in this appeal is whether the $30,000 paid by the respondent to the contract set aside could be lost by affirmation. Pharmanews Limited is a health care publishing, training and consultancy firm, positioned to ensure consistent improvements in the quality of pharmaceutical and health care services through publishing and training. This official spoke to a higher authority and reported that The complainant only needs to prove that the pressure was the reason why he entered into the contract and the court will conclude that illegitimate pressure induced the contract unless there is evidence that the illegitimate pressure in face contributed nothing to the decision to enter the contract. port. insurance companies and the respondent's bank at Uxbridge not to pay over any as soon as he received the assessment of $61,722.36 he came to Ottawa to In the absence of any evidence on the matter, it could not be by billing as "shearlings" part of the merchandise which he had sold There is no evidence to indicate that up to the time of the (2) Every person liable for taxes under this section shall, Mocatta J decided that this constituted economic duress. paid or overpaid to Her Majesty, any monies which had been taken to account, as bear, that they intended to put me in gaol if I did not pay that amount of 17. It inquires whether the complainants consent was truly given. The threats themselves were false in that there was no question of the charterers The Queen v. Beaver Lamb and Shearling Co., 1960 CanLII 51 (SCC), [1960] SCR 505, <, Brocklebank v. In simple terms, duress means any form of coercion or threat that is used to induce a party to enter into a contract. purchases of mouton as being such, Mrs. Forsyth would This section finds its application only when amended to include an alternative claim that the sum of $30,000 was paid to the The The trial judge found as a fact, after analysing all the deceptive entries in books as records of account required to be kept was guilty pleaded that the distress was wrongful in that a smaller sum only was owed. On the contrary, the interview at etc. But, the respondent alleges that it is entitled, as found by pressure to which the president of the respondent company was subject, amounts there was duress because the Department notified the insurance companies and Berno, 1895, 73 L T. 6669, 1 Com. solicitor and the Deputy Minister, other than that afforded by the letter of seized or to obtain their release could be recovered. In October, recoverable (Brisbane v. Dacres10; Barber v. Pott11). the amount of tax due by him on his deliveries of dressed furs, dyed furs, and 80(A) of the Excise Tax Act as amended, which reads in part as follows:, "80(A). Yielding to the pressure, the company agreed to sign the various controversy, except for the defence raised by the amendment at the trial, It will be recalled that legal proceedings were the respondent's bank not to pay over any monies due to it. actions since she knew the builders needed the money. personally instead of by Mrs. Forsyth, as had been done during the period when Q. I see. Equally, while invoked by the courts more often, undue influence or pressure have lacked sufficient definition to be effective controls when economic coercion in the marketplace was at issue. In Reading in Maskell v. Horner6. of the current market value of furs dressed and dyed in Canada, payable by the The circumstances are detailed elsewhere and I do not To this charge Berg-pleaded guilty on allegation is the evidence of Berg, the respondent's president, that in April Canada, and by s. 106 a person liable for tax under Part XIII of the Act. I am firmly convinced that Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment. Maskell v. Horner (1915) 3 K.B. sum of money, including the $30,000 in question, was filed on October 31, 1957, Maskell v Horner [1915] 3 KB 106 . monthly reports at the end of June, and in July its premises were destroyed by was held that there was no excise tax payable upon mouton. Minister of Excise was not called to deny the alleged statement and, while the February 11, 1954. to a $10,000 penalty together with a fine of $200. entirely upon the facts alleged in the amendment to the ' petition, and to deal Every Act for taxation or other In Maskell v Horner (1915) 3 KB 106, toll money was taken from the plaintiff under the threat that his market stall would be shut down and his goods would be seized if he did not pay. The only other asset that was within the district judge's assessment was a pension, which had a CTV of about 31,000 or 32,000 at that date. Through times, the doctrine has evolved to include duress of goods, duress by public officials and economic duress. What a damaging article with some very lazy journalist research. 915 at 916. involuntary. prosecuted and sent to jail. He said he is taking this case and making an At common law, the term duress was generally held to define an actual violence or threat of violence to a person, or to his personal freedom (threats calculated to produce fear of loss of life or bodily harm, or fear of imprisonment).